Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Evelyn's avatar

Yes, yes, yes. My husband is 16 months sober from a porn addiction that was ruining all of us. He was sexually anorexic, so, even though he had access to a size 4, Ivy MBA girlfriend/wife, he didn't want that. He wanted the screens, all day every day. The "if you just put out more, he wouldn't need porn" is simply not how it works. Porn is *different* than being with a real person. That, in many ways, is the whole point. Always accessible, completely anonymous, with infinite variety - no real person can be that. He's in his 50s, so it started with magazines at 10 or 11. By the end, it was his iPad. And the whole "harmless indulgence" argument? A21 and the International Justice Mission would like a word. Porn is *intended* to be addictive. Normalizing it as "every guy does it" not only echos the rationale of every addict out there, it ignores the agony it causes to family members and to the addict himself. My 16 year old daughter hasn't spoken to her dad in over a year. "Those girls in the videos are around my age", she said to me not long ago. It's not harmless, it's not cute, it's not because we need to quit bitching and spread our legs. It's a scourge - by design - and it is destroying people.

Expand full comment
Green_mama_J's avatar

I think the defending of using women’s bodies for lustful purposes is hysterical. It assumes there is a lower class of women as whore who deserve to be used in this way. It also assumes that men do not have the ability to practice self-discipline and to turn away from sexual passions or temptation.

Expand full comment
163 more comments...

No posts